2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2008 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2008 Mercury Sable is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercury Sable (260 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mercury Sable. (332 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 2008 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Cherokee | Sable |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2774 cc | 3496 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 332 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 78 L |