2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,700 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (312 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Jeep | Jaguar |
| Model | Cherokee | XF |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2200 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |
