2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (207 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 376 kg more than 2011 Kia Cadenza.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Kia Cadenza. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Jeep | Kia |
| Model | Cherokee | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 290 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2845 mm |
