2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2012 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2012 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki SX4 (150 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki SX4 should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 624 kg more than 2012 Suzuki SX4.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Suzuki SX4. (190 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Suzuki SX4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 2012 Suzuki SX4 | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Cherokee | SX4 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1864 kg | 1240 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |