2005 Jeep Commander vs. 1951 Mercury Roadster
To start off, 2005 Jeep Commander is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercury Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercury Roadster would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Mercury Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Commander | 1951 Mercury Roadster | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Commander | Roadster |
Year Released | 2005 | 1951 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 3990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2960 mm |