2005 Jeep Commander vs. 1977 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2005 Jeep Commander is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Commander | 1977 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Commander | Cougar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2910 mm |