2005 Jeep Commander vs. 1985 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Jeep Commander is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Commander | 1985 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Commander | Colt |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1439 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2390 mm |
