2005 Jeep Commander vs. 1988 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2005 Jeep Commander is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Commander | 1988 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Commander | Cougar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1988 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1860 mm |