2005 Jeep Commander vs. 1992 Rover 620i
To start off, 2005 Jeep Commander is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 620i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 620i would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Rover 620i. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1992 Rover 620i has manual transmission. 1992 Rover 620i will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Commander | 1992 Rover 620i | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Commander | 620i |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1720 mm |