2005 Jeep Commander vs. 1998 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2005 Jeep Commander is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mazda Midge. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1998 Mazda Midge has manual transmission. 1998 Mazda Midge will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Commander | 1998 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Commander | Midge |
Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1650 mm |