2005 Jeep Commander vs. 2001 MG X10
To start off, 2005 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG X10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG X10 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 MG X10. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Commander | 2001 MG X10 | |
| Make | Jeep | MG |
| Model | Commander | X10 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
