2005 Jeep Commander vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Commander would be higher.
Because 2005 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Commander | 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost | |
| Make | Jeep | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Commander | Ghost |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1948 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3465 mm |
