2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Jeep | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 6C |
Year Released | 2005 | 1938 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 77 L |