2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1954 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Jeep | Riley |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | RM A |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2870 mm |
