2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1962 MG 1100
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1962 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1962 MG 1100.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 MG 1100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 MG 1100. (83 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1962 MG 1100 | |
Make | Jeep | MG |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 1100 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 83 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2380 mm |