2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1963 Renault 8
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 8 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (235 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1963 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1078 kg more than 1963 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1963 Renault 8 | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1818 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 38 L |