2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1964 Rover P5
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rover P5 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1964 Rover P5. (119 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1964 Rover P5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (394 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Rover P5. (219 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Rover P5.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1964 Rover P5 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Grand Cherokee | P5 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 394 Nm | 219 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 77.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 105 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 52 L |