2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (626 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (319 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1967 Mercury Park Lane | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Park Lane |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 6990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 626 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3130 mm |