2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1968 Opel Commodore
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Opel Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Opel Commodore would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1968 Opel Commodore. (94 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1968 Opel Commodore.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Opel Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (393 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Opel Commodore. (157 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Opel Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1968 Opel Commodore | |
Make | Jeep | Opel |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Commodore |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 2239 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 157 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 70 L |