2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1969 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1969 Nissan Bluebird. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1969 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (393 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Nissan Bluebird. (103 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1969 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 103 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2430 mm |
