2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (123 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (393 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2680 mm |