2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1982 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda Rapid R.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (394 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1982 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Jeep | Skoda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Rapid R |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 394 Nm | 99 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 72 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 47 L |