2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1982 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki Cervo.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (52 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Suzuki Cervo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1982 Suzuki Cervo | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Cervo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3704 cc | 538 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1220 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2040 mm |
