2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP) has 172 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (74 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Jeep | Volkswagen |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Polo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 39 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 74 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 59 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2340 mm |