2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1983 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (57 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (113 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1983 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 113 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2560 mm |