2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1990 Mazda 323
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1990 Mazda 323. (56 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1990 Mazda 323.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mazda 323. (114 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1990 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 323 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1720 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 114 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2460 mm |
