2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (197 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (394 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (291 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 3351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 394 Nm | 291 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2740 mm |