2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1995 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1995 Nissan Pulsar. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1995 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Nissan Pulsar. (147 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1995 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2440 mm |
