2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Jeep | Rover |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 200 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1410 mm |
