2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1995 Rover 600
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 600 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1995 Rover 600. (104 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 600.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Rover 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (393 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 600. (210 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1995 Rover 600 | |
| Make | Jeep | Rover |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | 600 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 393 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 89 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2730 mm |
