2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Rover 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (127 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 127 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2510 mm |