2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1997 Proton 300
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Proton 300 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1997 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1997 Proton 300.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Proton 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (393 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Proton 300. (108 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1997 Proton 300 | |
Make | Jeep | Proton |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 300 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2450 mm |