2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1998 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1998 Suzuki Swift. (52 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1998 Suzuki Swift.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Suzuki Swift. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Suzuki Swift. (76 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1998 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Swift |
Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 76 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2270 mm |