2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2003 Maserati Kubang
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Maserati Kubang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Maserati Kubang would be higher. At 4,244 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Maserati Kubang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Maserati Kubang (385 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Maserati Kubang should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Maserati Kubang (461 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (319 Nm). This means 2003 Maserati Kubang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2003 Maserati Kubang | |
| Make | Jeep | Maserati |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Kubang |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 3704 cc | 4244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 461 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
