2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP) has 124 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (393 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Jeep | MCC |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Smart |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 393 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 47 L |