2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (230 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (394 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln LS. (388 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Jeep | Lincoln |
Model | Grand Cherokee | LS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 3933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 394 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 68 L |