2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2008 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (228 HP @ 8200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (394 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2008 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 394 Nm | 211 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 61 L |