2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2010 Buick LaCrosse

To start off, 2010 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2010 Buick LaCrosse. (182 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2010 Buick LaCrosse.

Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Buick LaCrosse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Buick LaCrosse. (233 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Buick LaCrosse.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 Buick LaCrosse
Make Jeep Buick
Model Grand Cherokee LaCrosse
Year Released 2005 2010
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3704 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 211 HP 182 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6700 RPM
Torque 319 Nm 233 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4750 mm 5001 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1857 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1504 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2837 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 11.2 L/100km 7.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.8 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 78 L 70 L