2005 Jeep Liberty vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Jeep Liberty is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Liberty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Liberty weights approximately 601 kg more than 1953 Riley RM A.
Because 2005 Jeep Liberty is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Liberty will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Liberty | 1953 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Jeep | Riley |
| Model | Liberty | RM A |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1836 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2870 mm |
