2005 Jeep Liberty vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Liberty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Liberty would be higher. At 3,686 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Liberty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Liberty (210 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Liberty should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.
Because 2005 Jeep Liberty is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Liberty will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Liberty (319 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (174 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Liberty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Liberty | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Liberty | Hardbody |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3686 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 90 L |