2005 Jeep Liberty vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Liberty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Liberty would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Challenger (372 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Liberty. (150 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Liberty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 177 kg more than 2005 Jeep Liberty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Challenger (542 Nm) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Liberty. (224 Nm). This means 2010 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Liberty.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Liberty | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Jeep | Dodge |
Model | Liberty | Challenger |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 372 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 542 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1833 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5022 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 72 L |