2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 49 kg more than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1941 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Jeep | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Wrangler | 6C |
Year Released | 2005 | 1941 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 77 L |