2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1961 Land Rover A 109
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Land Rover A 109. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Land Rover A 109 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1961 Land Rover A 109. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1961 Land Rover A 109.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Land Rover A 109. (157 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Land Rover A 109.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1961 Land Rover A 109 | |
| Make | Jeep | Land Rover |
| Model | Wrangler | A 109 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1961 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2286 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 2070 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2780 mm |
