2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1963 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Seven. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1963 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | Wrangler | Seven |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 29 L |