2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 310 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jeep | Triumph |
Model | Wrangler | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |