2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1969 Mercedes-Benz C 111
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mercedes-Benz C 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mercedes-Benz C 111 would be higher. At 4,799 cc, 1969 Mercedes-Benz C 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mercedes-Benz C 111 (280 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mercedes-Benz C 111 should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Mercedes-Benz C 111. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mercedes-Benz C 111. (293 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mercedes-Benz C 111.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1969 Mercedes-Benz C 111 | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Wrangler | C 111 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 4799 cc |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 293 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1130 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 120 L |