2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 904 kg more than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | |
| Make | Jeep | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Wrangler | Camargue |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2425 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 99.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 2355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 107 L |
