2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1977 Simca 1309
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Simca 1309. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Simca 1309 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1977 Simca 1309. (87 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1977 Simca 1309.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Simca 1309. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Simca 1309. (134 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Simca 1309.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1977 Simca 1309 | |
| Make | Jeep | Simca |
| Model | Wrangler | 1309 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 134 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 80.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 58 L |
