2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1982 Nissan Leopard
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Leopard. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Leopard.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Leopard. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Leopard. (148 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Leopard.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1982 Nissan Leopard | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Wrangler | Leopard |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1770 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |
