2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (115 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Opel Ascona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Jeep | Opel |
| Model | Wrangler | Ascona |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 84.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2600 mm |
